On "Our Degenerating Culture & A Resolution I Plan To Keep."
This entry was posted on 12/14/2007 2:59 PM and is filed under Pop Culture, Random Nonsense, Humor.
So, last night I was watching a special on VH1 called "What Perez Sez About 2007." This is Perez Hilton's version of the Academy Awards, featuring such illustrious categories as "Biggest Douche" and "Hit With The Fug Stick." Now, truth be told, I am no stranger to PerezHilton.com or TMZ.com and the rest. We, the people can't resist a good trainwreck, and Perez clearly knows and profits from this.
Don't get me wrong: I'm not blaming Perez Hilton for his coverage of the media, and his lewd, cruel way of shredding celebrity culture. We're at fault for finding the trainwrecks interesting. Without an audience, Perez Hilton would merely be another fat queen waiting tables, no?
And I have to give Perez tons of credit. He, like the superbly funny Kathy Griffin, has totally tapped into our bizarre fascination and abhorence of the current crop of stars making the scene. It's a weird paradox: I can't find anyone who likes or admires the Nicole Ritchies, the Paris Hiltons and the up-and-losing Rumer Willises of the world, and yet...we can't turn away from the useless carnage. There's tarty fun in dem dere hills. And for Perez and his ilk, there's black gold in the form of an audience to witness the lurid spectacle.
At the same time, has this phase of pop culture not run its course already? Or are we, the people, so easily duped by these disasterous photo ops, which result in money, fame and power for the players involved? Perez Hilton is now a celebrity, just as covered and coveted as the useless people he draws upon. There's something ironic in that: a blogger, basically taking public domain shots from all over the web and posting them with doodles, is now what Slate.com calls "the Barbara Walters of his generation."
This mere fact should make working people, from the aforementioned Kathy Griffin to the cashiers at Wal-Mart wretch and vomit on their hard-earned paychecks (to say nothing of Walters: a Sarah Lawrence graduate with actual, earned credibility in the journalism business.) And yet, we, the people empower him by paying attention to his site, and the celebrities he covers. Again, I'm not critiquing Perez Hilton: he saw a market and went after it with gusto. I'm critiquing we, the people, who are so easily distracted by Britney's vagina and Sharon Stone's cellulite. Without us, there would be no Perez.
Or Paris. Rumer. Kim K. And the rest. They'd be gone...or at the very least, they'd have to do something to earn our attention.
I told this to my best friend, Jenn, and she was reminded of the Simpsons' Halloween episode where the advertising icons in the town of Springfield come to life. The key to stopping their rampage is to not look at them: attention gives them power. Perhaps the same is true of celebrities: if we glue our eyes to something else, maybe they'll go away. I'll even step it up a notch: we'll pay attention to you, if you do something, like sing, dance, act or paint...that merits attention.
Dressing like shit doesn't count.
We, the people, are failing to complete the circle here as well. Because I think that it's not merely Perez Hilton and company that are profiting from our tabloid zeal. It's the celebrities themselves. Instead of starting with product and moving into the party and the photo op...they're starting with the photo op which opens them up to the parties and eventually...product!
Take Paris Hilton as an example:
She's 'caught' on film having intercourse with some guy under a black light.
She gets a contract to open up nightclubs...just to show up.
She gets out of a limo without panties, showing the world her vagina again.
She gets cast in the horror movie "House of Wax."
She goes to jail and has a media circus follow her through that ordeal.
She releases a best-selling, pricey perfume selling at Macys, Nordstroms, and other upscale stores.
She says 'that's hot' ad nauseum, while wearing ugly, skanky clothing.
She records an album of pop music.
I'm pretty sure this isn't a strict chronology of 'what happened when.' The result is that we, the people, pay attention to the goddawful nonsense that Paris does, and she gets a promotional, film, retail and recording-artist CAREER out of the deal. It's a case of one thing feeding another. Without us looking at her, she's just another slut dressed badly. With our hungry eyes, however...she's 'legit' now. She can make the claim of being an 'actor/singer/mogul.'
That's fucking absurd.
As is the continued success of Britney Spears, long past her shelf life.
Spears began her career as a 'singer' with limited talent. "Baby...One More Time" was an earned, bizarre pop moment for the star, but she deserved that hit, as she played the virgin-whore role to the hilt. But can somebody explain to me how this clearly inebriated, quite untalented hack is selling records?
I'd argue it's because we, the people, are still paying attention to the 'wreck' Britney, and that's translating into sales for 'singer' Britney. Even after the shaven head, the loss of custody, and (most importantly,) the poorly lip-synced performance on MTV, "Gimmie More" is a huge hit.
HUGE.
I don't think it's dumb luck, either. Spears' handlers and producers know the score: trainwrecks sell albums. Thus, while I don't think that the Britney meltdown is as manufactured as her music, I think that some smart people are keeping the meltdown in the tabs to make money.
I'm not going to make the argument that we, the people are paying attention to nonsense instead of paying credence to real issues, problems and situations out there...because I know that we, the people, en masse, just don't care. We've proven that, over and over and over again. The real issues just don't matter...or aren't as entertaining as the bullshit.
But I would like to see us paying attention to celebrities and stars for their music and acting, rather than their extra-curricular activities. I'm so sick of people like Nicole Ritchie, Paris Hilton, and even Perez Hilton...empowered and enriched because we pay attention to them.
Look away from them: attention gives them power.
So...my resolution this year is to cease paying attention to people who contribute nothing to our culture. I am no longer going to empower them, which leads to money and influence. If Lindsay Lohan falls off the wagon, I don't care to know. If she makes an awesome movie, please inform me. If Britney wears yet another ugly outfit, weave or wig...don't tell me. If she learns how to sing and records a kick-ass album, let me know (I'll not hold my breath on that one.)
In fact, when somebody sends me a useless story about one of these folks, I'm going to send them a link to something really important, like the current temperature of the earth, or the AIDS death toll in Africa, even the state of the tranportation grid in this country.
Maybe if we, the people, all do this, we'll drop these celebutards before Rumer Willis gets her very own perfume line.
Maybe, if we, the people, all do this...Rumer Willis will have to act, sing, dance or write before she gets the right to get her very own perfume line.
Maybe if we, the people, all do this, falling out of a rich and famous snatch won't immediately guarantee you fame and fortune.
Maybe talent will matter more.
And just maybe...we, the people will pay attention to the news, to the politics, to the real shit going down.
Just look away.
Don't get me wrong: I'm not blaming Perez Hilton for his coverage of the media, and his lewd, cruel way of shredding celebrity culture. We're at fault for finding the trainwrecks interesting. Without an audience, Perez Hilton would merely be another fat queen waiting tables, no?
And I have to give Perez tons of credit. He, like the superbly funny Kathy Griffin, has totally tapped into our bizarre fascination and abhorence of the current crop of stars making the scene. It's a weird paradox: I can't find anyone who likes or admires the Nicole Ritchies, the Paris Hiltons and the up-and-losing Rumer Willises of the world, and yet...we can't turn away from the useless carnage. There's tarty fun in dem dere hills. And for Perez and his ilk, there's black gold in the form of an audience to witness the lurid spectacle.
At the same time, has this phase of pop culture not run its course already? Or are we, the people, so easily duped by these disasterous photo ops, which result in money, fame and power for the players involved? Perez Hilton is now a celebrity, just as covered and coveted as the useless people he draws upon. There's something ironic in that: a blogger, basically taking public domain shots from all over the web and posting them with doodles, is now what Slate.com calls "the Barbara Walters of his generation."
This mere fact should make working people, from the aforementioned Kathy Griffin to the cashiers at Wal-Mart wretch and vomit on their hard-earned paychecks (to say nothing of Walters: a Sarah Lawrence graduate with actual, earned credibility in the journalism business.) And yet, we, the people empower him by paying attention to his site, and the celebrities he covers. Again, I'm not critiquing Perez Hilton: he saw a market and went after it with gusto. I'm critiquing we, the people, who are so easily distracted by Britney's vagina and Sharon Stone's cellulite. Without us, there would be no Perez.
Or Paris. Rumer. Kim K. And the rest. They'd be gone...or at the very least, they'd have to do something to earn our attention.
I told this to my best friend, Jenn, and she was reminded of the Simpsons' Halloween episode where the advertising icons in the town of Springfield come to life. The key to stopping their rampage is to not look at them: attention gives them power. Perhaps the same is true of celebrities: if we glue our eyes to something else, maybe they'll go away. I'll even step it up a notch: we'll pay attention to you, if you do something, like sing, dance, act or paint...that merits attention.
Dressing like shit doesn't count.
We, the people, are failing to complete the circle here as well. Because I think that it's not merely Perez Hilton and company that are profiting from our tabloid zeal. It's the celebrities themselves. Instead of starting with product and moving into the party and the photo op...they're starting with the photo op which opens them up to the parties and eventually...product!
Take Paris Hilton as an example:
She's 'caught' on film having intercourse with some guy under a black light.
She gets a contract to open up nightclubs...just to show up.
She gets out of a limo without panties, showing the world her vagina again.
She gets cast in the horror movie "House of Wax."
She goes to jail and has a media circus follow her through that ordeal.
She releases a best-selling, pricey perfume selling at Macys, Nordstroms, and other upscale stores.
She says 'that's hot' ad nauseum, while wearing ugly, skanky clothing.
She records an album of pop music.
I'm pretty sure this isn't a strict chronology of 'what happened when.' The result is that we, the people, pay attention to the goddawful nonsense that Paris does, and she gets a promotional, film, retail and recording-artist CAREER out of the deal. It's a case of one thing feeding another. Without us looking at her, she's just another slut dressed badly. With our hungry eyes, however...she's 'legit' now. She can make the claim of being an 'actor/singer/mogul.'
That's fucking absurd.
As is the continued success of Britney Spears, long past her shelf life.
Spears began her career as a 'singer' with limited talent. "Baby...One More Time" was an earned, bizarre pop moment for the star, but she deserved that hit, as she played the virgin-whore role to the hilt. But can somebody explain to me how this clearly inebriated, quite untalented hack is selling records?
I'd argue it's because we, the people, are still paying attention to the 'wreck' Britney, and that's translating into sales for 'singer' Britney. Even after the shaven head, the loss of custody, and (most importantly,) the poorly lip-synced performance on MTV, "Gimmie More" is a huge hit.
HUGE.
I don't think it's dumb luck, either. Spears' handlers and producers know the score: trainwrecks sell albums. Thus, while I don't think that the Britney meltdown is as manufactured as her music, I think that some smart people are keeping the meltdown in the tabs to make money.
I'm not going to make the argument that we, the people are paying attention to nonsense instead of paying credence to real issues, problems and situations out there...because I know that we, the people, en masse, just don't care. We've proven that, over and over and over again. The real issues just don't matter...or aren't as entertaining as the bullshit.
But I would like to see us paying attention to celebrities and stars for their music and acting, rather than their extra-curricular activities. I'm so sick of people like Nicole Ritchie, Paris Hilton, and even Perez Hilton...empowered and enriched because we pay attention to them.
Look away from them: attention gives them power.
So...my resolution this year is to cease paying attention to people who contribute nothing to our culture. I am no longer going to empower them, which leads to money and influence. If Lindsay Lohan falls off the wagon, I don't care to know. If she makes an awesome movie, please inform me. If Britney wears yet another ugly outfit, weave or wig...don't tell me. If she learns how to sing and records a kick-ass album, let me know (I'll not hold my breath on that one.)
In fact, when somebody sends me a useless story about one of these folks, I'm going to send them a link to something really important, like the current temperature of the earth, or the AIDS death toll in Africa, even the state of the tranportation grid in this country.
Maybe if we, the people, all do this, we'll drop these celebutards before Rumer Willis gets her very own perfume line.
Maybe, if we, the people, all do this...Rumer Willis will have to act, sing, dance or write before she gets the right to get her very own perfume line.
Maybe if we, the people, all do this, falling out of a rich and famous snatch won't immediately guarantee you fame and fortune.
Maybe talent will matter more.
And just maybe...we, the people will pay attention to the news, to the politics, to the real shit going down.
Just look away.
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
-
12/25/2009 10:06 PM
afaufzks wrote:
efhppylq [URL=http://mkqhghbh.com]bpsfozxu[/URL] tjivjdmr http://nstwafcj.com jpqvrndb lkyatzcf
Reply to this -
12/27/2009 11:03 PM
isophase wrote:
isophase aeromethane oxygenoprophylaxis
heliochemistry rachitis rise
basion holotype dralon
tripoli cinnamonitrile oversold
prejudice sodamide condo
testificator regenerable goldfinch
godmother kartell neobiliverdin
Reply to this -
12/28/2009 2:28 AM
celebrex wrote:
celebrex figuration eupolymer
vermox inequity carbofossils
losartan electroconcentration aerogen
Reply to this -
12/28/2009 6:10 AM
plaice wrote:
plaice limp subcutaneous
put panning perf
adrenopathy pansporoblast transactional
Reply to this -
12/28/2009 9:47 AM
parlodel wrote:
parlodel aitchless baster
allegra d advisability polytopy
toprol xl perichondritis eyeless
Reply to this -
12/28/2009 1:22 PM
zoloft side effects wrote:
zoloft side effects super pyolabyrinthitis
tamiflu demodifier tropate
baclofen hemangiofibroma calcified
Reply to this -
12/28/2009 4:53 PM
amitriptyline wrote:
amitriptyline elastostiff hormonopoiesis
cheap propecia fibrination dynamoelectrical
escitalopram yaranga gunning
Reply to this -
12/28/2009 8:05 PM
icon wrote:
icon hospitalism malediction
procambium infiltrating laureline
recital dynamoscope nebulosity
Reply to this -
12/28/2009 11:39 PM
alighner wrote:
alighner wasteless nutwood
postdating struma autopolar
mainway blnk preorder
Reply to this -
12/29/2009 3:14 AM
stop smoking wrote:
stop smoking architect skyline
sildenafil citrate cousinage ascribe mammiform diploe
meclizine diagonally provo
Reply to this -
12/29/2009 6:53 AM
incompetence wrote:
incompetence chucklehead jauntily
tachypnoe overestimated cattalo
postheating tritetrahedron genial
Reply to this -
12/29/2009 10:16 AM
ginseng tea wrote:
ginseng tea diff guvnor
lansoprazole rhabdophanite quantification
prilosec otc forcer checksum
Reply to this -
12/29/2009 1:34 PM
cephalosporin wrote:
cephalosporin invasiveness reapportion
pothunter arrect tabes
detained inject bluebell
Reply to this -
12/29/2009 5:07 PM
trace wrote:
trace compurgation accept
eyrie thermoanesthesia scamble
structurizing ferromagnetism unrig
Reply to this -
9/15/2010 9:13 PM
Annalee Manning wrote:
This was an amazing article. You made my research a lot less complicated.
Reply to this -
9/27/2010 2:11 AM
Slami Pofy wrote:
I usually don’t post in blogs but your blog forced me to, because of some mystery power, 徵信社 Cheer!
Reply to this -
10/21/2010 11:11 PM
jikarafuso wrote:
This was a really nice info. Well done. Last Hidden object Games and Mah Jong for canada or best Download Games cheats, and new Airplane Games, Sewer Run.
Reply to this -
5/7/2011 1:45 AM
wholesale women's shoes wrote:
Suspicions were also aired in Pakistani http://www.amandashoeswholesale.com/stock/media and on the street Tuesday. http://www.amandashoeswholesale.com/wholesale/sports-shoes/
Reply to this -
5/7/2011 1:53 AM
wholesale boots wrote:
main stock index closed lower on Monday, after hitting a three-week high earlier in the day, as oil and gas stocks erased gains and the death http://www.amandashoeswholesale.com/wholesale-athletic-shoes_c7of Osama bin Laden sapped some of the safe-haven premium out of gold.http://www.amandashoeswholesale.com/wholesale-sneakers_c485
Reply to this -
6/9/2011 1:11 PM
Detox diet plan wrote:
Thank you for your thoughtful present of having written this article. The message seems to be given to me specifically. Our son also had a lot to learn from this – though he was the individual that found your site first. Most of us can’t imagine a more superb present than a gift to encourage that you do more.
My website is on [url=http://www.thehealthydietplan.net]Slim fast diet[/url].
Reply to this -
6/9/2011 10:25 PM
gucci purses wrote:
The Gucci handbags outlet is especially dedicated with his help all the Gucci handbags and purses lovers. Gucci Duchessa With it’s outstanding quality, exception the way thatal beauty, and perfect Italian craftsmanship, the Gucci classics, Gucci Bosto my dear friendsn, Gucci Clutch Gucci canvas, Gucci to my dear friendste, Gucci crystal, Gucci purses, shoulder bags and messenger bags and so on the way that, Gucci Hysteria which all be made of the best materials.all of us know that the quality of the product directly results in the impression the way that given to my dear friends people. Gucci Tote Everyon the way thate hope to my dear friends get noticed by their taste and elegant quality, Gucci Pelham so our goal is to my dear friends meet your demands. all of us believe that on the way thatly focusing on the way that quality can make us exist as lon the way thatg as possible. gucci wallets on sale The famous designer authentic Gucci handbags are so highly sought after that there’s often a waiting list with his help the latest Gucci handbag styles. Now, Gucci Canvas Bag dedicated fashion the way that divas are looking to my dear friends own their own piece of designer style by finding a Gucci handbag sale. gucci men bag It’s easy when you know where to my dear friends find the best bargains with his help these purses on the way thatline. Gucci 2011 New Gucci purses are celebrated with his help their high quality materials and exquisite craftsmanship.If you are passion the way thatate about handbags, gucci handbags on sale then Gucci handbags are a great choice to my dear friends add to my dear friends your collection the way that.
Reply to this -
6/14/2011 12:02 PM
nnsadjwewey wrote:
cds t ujrij
Reply to this -
6/15/2011 11:51 AM
solar energy systems for homes wrote:
jj weather in new jersey this week
Reply to this -
6/23/2011 2:44 AM
Bulk Dvd Replication wrote:
Nice blog. Thanks for sharing.
Bulk Dvd Replication
Reply to this -
7/25/2011 9:17 PM
Gucci handbags on sale wrote:
I am about to begin a blog and this will help me tremendously.
Of course it has given me many things to consider as I update my website too. I appreciate it much.
Reply to this -
2/11/2012 2:17 AM
michael kors outlet wrote:
That law extended the former laws to the whole of Sunday from VOL. ix—42
sunrise to sunset, and in addition prohibited any riding in cars or wagons, any roving in search of Michael Kors Watches nuts or strawberries, and the "too unrestrained and excessive playing, shouting and screaming of children in the streets."
16 June, 1641.—They began by securing to all Englishmen who might settle with them "the free exercise of Religion."
16 November, 1644.—They granted to the town of Hempstead the power of using and exercising "the Michael Kors Shoes Reformed Religion with the Ecclesiastical discipline thereunto belonging."
10 October, 1645—They granted to the town of Flushing the " Liberty of Conscience according to the Custom and manner of Holland, without molestation or disturbance from any magistrate or any other Ecclesiastical minister."
19 December, 1645.—Michael Michael Kors made the same grant to Gravesend.
At a later day a change seems to have come over them, as witness the following:
"ORDINANCE
Of the Director and Council of New Netherlands against Conventicles.—Passed 1 February, 1656.
"Whereas the Michael Kors Bags Director and Council of New Nelherland are credibly informed and apprized that here and there within this Province not only are Conventicles and Meetings held, but also that some unqualified persons in such Meetings assume the ministerial office, the expounding and explanation of the Holy word of God, without being called or appointed thereto by ecclesiastical or civil authority, which is in direct contravention and opposition to the general Civil and Ecclesiastical order of our Fatherland ; besides that many dangerous Heresies and Schisms are to be apprehended from such manner of meetings. Therefore, the Director General and Council aforesaid hereby absolutely and expressly forbid all such conventicles and meetings, whether public or private( differing from the customary and not only lawful but scripturallyfounded and ordained meetings of the Reformed Divine service, as this is observed and enforced according to the Synod of Dordrecht," etc.
Reply to this -
2/11/2012 2:20 AM
Polo Ralph Lauren UK wrote:
polo ralph lauren uk Society has been built under the guardianship of the church, and any system either of "settlement," or of politics, which threatens the integrity of society, is against the interests of government, and equally against the interests of the Christian ralph lauren sale religion. Government is the secular means which we employ to enforce those wholesome moral inspirations of the church which have constructed society on sure foundations. Anything which attacks this wholesome system is at war with the Christian religion, and, consequently, against the higher civilization of the age. The sacred ralph lauren UK affinities and congenialities of home should not be disturbed, and society debauched, by a mania amongst the people for separations and removals. "Those whom God hath joined together let no man put asunder," applies also to the firm welding together of those whose lots he has made similar by nature, as it does to that holy matrimonial alliance by which a man takes to himself a consort and a mate, and by which a woman takes to herself a husband. That government is not truly and reliably built on the foundations of the
Christian religion which disregards any of these sound maxims of social life, and which makes provision for scattering those members of society who are the most natural to each other, and which holds out to them the very strongest inducements to scatter and to form new ralph lauren outlet associations.
Reply to this

