On "Why Decreasing Our Energy Use Is The Most Patriotic Thing We Can Do."
This entry was posted on 10/29/2007 2:57 PM and is filed under Politics, Global.
Just last week, I reported that oil was heading up towards $100 a gallon(while Dumbledore got most of the attention by being gay. Sometimes we, the people, pay attention to the dumbledorest shit.)
Now, with a King Learesque mania, the drumbeat of war is playing. The US is imposing harsher sanctions on Iran. The small, revolutionary faction of nutjobs (running the most cosmopolitan, educated and modern culture in the Middle East outside of Israel) are pumping up their bluster. The Holy Land is stopping fuel shipments to the Gaza Strip (because we've apparently had too much peace in the Middle East for what? A week? Three hours?)
What in tarnation is going on? Did everyone eat their Crazy Flakes for breakfast?
Here's the thing: a US or Israeli strike/invasion/expansion of the mess south of the border will almost certainly raise oil prices through the roof. Like to $150 a gallon or some other, insane number. Simultaneously, the only way to truly 'take out' Iran is by removing the oil wealth from the current regime (kinda sounds like the second verse in the Iraq adventure, eh?) We've now seen just how pesky the whole proposition is...and this is from a less prideful and nationalistic country.
You know, I wrote about this earlier in the year. At that time, I was looking for a long-term solution to the situation. To remove Iran's support of terrorist regimes, you remove the cash that keeps funding them (oil, in case you haven't been paying attention.) But I was thinking along the lines of a five-year plan...or a ten-year plan where the dependent countries cut their usage of black crude back via renewables, sacrifice and alternative energy sources. If less people want the oil, the price drops and the regimes built on the back of oil have less leverage and funds with which to spread their influence. Don't get me wrong: not all countries with an oil base will be hurt by the price drop. Saudi Arabia has invested heavily in secondary industry "opening up" their economy if not their culture. Dubai and the other Emirates have done the same. Iran hasn't. Oil prices being high breeds wealth...but Iran has chosen to fund shadow armies against the West (to be fair...Iran's unelected leadership has chosen this. I'm pretty sure the peeps on the ground would like something different.) What happens when the funds get cut-off?
That was the whole point of the other piece. Wean us down off oil and cut off their supplies. That way, if Iran threatens somebody, we, the people have actual power in the situation. We can effectively 'North Korea' that country until they bend to our will.
But this way is just batshit insane! Oil is headed past $100. That's a given at this point. If we're at 'peak oil,' if we're approaching 'peak oil,' or if it's just a case of too much instability in the world...or too many people wanting the oil now...it doesn't matter. Attacking Iran will only increase this problem...even if we 'take them out.'
Why is this bad? Well, the countries that are now competing for the oil, countries just beginning to realize their modern potential (for better or worse,) will be pushed off. Let me put it another way: peaceful, growing India can't afford $150 a barrel oil. Neither can China. And while America, Europe and Japan kinda-sorta can, imagine what a hit that will be.
And not just to us. We, the people may consume less lead-filled Barbies...and if we buy less of them, the economy of China utterly collapses. That's a real fact: most of the rest of the world is dependent on our consumerism. We buy less Kias, and South Koreans eat less rice.
Maybe that's the plan (I may be giving Bush & Co. too much credit. A plan? Huh?) To knock down the developing world back into the Third. But really...isn't that worse in the long term? Look, I'm not a fan of China proving that totalitarianism and capitalism can and do work hand-in-hand, but I'd rather deal with an educated, intelligent China in the future than the zealots that emerged hungry and stupid after The Great Leap Forward. I'd much prefer a world diluted in culture by McDonalds and Wal-Marts if the benefit is a world of much more equal parity. This all starts with the big dog (that would be us,) taking the lead and dramatically decreasing our fossil fuel use. And showing our allies in the world how to do the same.
Moreover, decreasing our fossil fuel useage sends a clear message to the current administration and his followers bastardizing the Republican Party. Get. A. Grip. If we're such great country, such an example...then we, the people need to lead us down a path of reason and sense, not power and bluster. Imagine if we cut our energy use by 5% a year for the next 10 years (or in half in 10.) Imagine the power we'd actually have in the Middle East...to not be scared by oil spikes and other such nonsense.
This isn't a remote possibility, either. We have in our power right now...today, cars that average 35-45 miles to the gallon (and not just hybrids.) What if all of us drove one of those, instead of the Buffet-monster-truckUV? I'm not even talking about the dreaded, liberal environment here. You want to cut off funding to terrorist groups supported by Iran's oil money? Buy less damn oil! Buy a damn Toyota Yaris or Honda Fit or Ford Focus! Wear a sweater in the winter or sweat a little in the summer, but turn down the damn A/C!
There's a myth that's keeping we, the people from doing this...and that would be the vaunted American Way of Life. But really...that two-car garaged tract house version is merely a recent invention. Prior to WWII, the American Way of Life was to be free! It may have been framed in 'Industrial Revolution' drag, or 'Pioneers killing the Indians' drag, or 'No Taxes from the English' drag...but the dream was freedom!
So let's get free from our dependence of countries that have no appreciation for freedom...and let's put the cheap motoring society in its place. Remember that it's merely clothing on the body politic composed of we, the people. We, the people, have outgrown the fabric. It's time to sew anew.
Now, with a King Learesque mania, the drumbeat of war is playing. The US is imposing harsher sanctions on Iran. The small, revolutionary faction of nutjobs (running the most cosmopolitan, educated and modern culture in the Middle East outside of Israel) are pumping up their bluster. The Holy Land is stopping fuel shipments to the Gaza Strip (because we've apparently had too much peace in the Middle East for what? A week? Three hours?)
What in tarnation is going on? Did everyone eat their Crazy Flakes for breakfast?
Here's the thing: a US or Israeli strike/invasion/expansion of the mess south of the border will almost certainly raise oil prices through the roof. Like to $150 a gallon or some other, insane number. Simultaneously, the only way to truly 'take out' Iran is by removing the oil wealth from the current regime (kinda sounds like the second verse in the Iraq adventure, eh?) We've now seen just how pesky the whole proposition is...and this is from a less prideful and nationalistic country.
You know, I wrote about this earlier in the year. At that time, I was looking for a long-term solution to the situation. To remove Iran's support of terrorist regimes, you remove the cash that keeps funding them (oil, in case you haven't been paying attention.) But I was thinking along the lines of a five-year plan...or a ten-year plan where the dependent countries cut their usage of black crude back via renewables, sacrifice and alternative energy sources. If less people want the oil, the price drops and the regimes built on the back of oil have less leverage and funds with which to spread their influence. Don't get me wrong: not all countries with an oil base will be hurt by the price drop. Saudi Arabia has invested heavily in secondary industry "opening up" their economy if not their culture. Dubai and the other Emirates have done the same. Iran hasn't. Oil prices being high breeds wealth...but Iran has chosen to fund shadow armies against the West (to be fair...Iran's unelected leadership has chosen this. I'm pretty sure the peeps on the ground would like something different.) What happens when the funds get cut-off?
That was the whole point of the other piece. Wean us down off oil and cut off their supplies. That way, if Iran threatens somebody, we, the people have actual power in the situation. We can effectively 'North Korea' that country until they bend to our will.
But this way is just batshit insane! Oil is headed past $100. That's a given at this point. If we're at 'peak oil,' if we're approaching 'peak oil,' or if it's just a case of too much instability in the world...or too many people wanting the oil now...it doesn't matter. Attacking Iran will only increase this problem...even if we 'take them out.'
Why is this bad? Well, the countries that are now competing for the oil, countries just beginning to realize their modern potential (for better or worse,) will be pushed off. Let me put it another way: peaceful, growing India can't afford $150 a barrel oil. Neither can China. And while America, Europe and Japan kinda-sorta can, imagine what a hit that will be.
And not just to us. We, the people may consume less lead-filled Barbies...and if we buy less of them, the economy of China utterly collapses. That's a real fact: most of the rest of the world is dependent on our consumerism. We buy less Kias, and South Koreans eat less rice.
Maybe that's the plan (I may be giving Bush & Co. too much credit. A plan? Huh?) To knock down the developing world back into the Third. But really...isn't that worse in the long term? Look, I'm not a fan of China proving that totalitarianism and capitalism can and do work hand-in-hand, but I'd rather deal with an educated, intelligent China in the future than the zealots that emerged hungry and stupid after The Great Leap Forward. I'd much prefer a world diluted in culture by McDonalds and Wal-Marts if the benefit is a world of much more equal parity. This all starts with the big dog (that would be us,) taking the lead and dramatically decreasing our fossil fuel use. And showing our allies in the world how to do the same.
Moreover, decreasing our fossil fuel useage sends a clear message to the current administration and his followers bastardizing the Republican Party. Get. A. Grip. If we're such great country, such an example...then we, the people need to lead us down a path of reason and sense, not power and bluster. Imagine if we cut our energy use by 5% a year for the next 10 years (or in half in 10.) Imagine the power we'd actually have in the Middle East...to not be scared by oil spikes and other such nonsense.
This isn't a remote possibility, either. We have in our power right now...today, cars that average 35-45 miles to the gallon (and not just hybrids.) What if all of us drove one of those, instead of the Buffet-monster-truckUV? I'm not even talking about the dreaded, liberal environment here. You want to cut off funding to terrorist groups supported by Iran's oil money? Buy less damn oil! Buy a damn Toyota Yaris or Honda Fit or Ford Focus! Wear a sweater in the winter or sweat a little in the summer, but turn down the damn A/C!
There's a myth that's keeping we, the people from doing this...and that would be the vaunted American Way of Life. But really...that two-car garaged tract house version is merely a recent invention. Prior to WWII, the American Way of Life was to be free! It may have been framed in 'Industrial Revolution' drag, or 'Pioneers killing the Indians' drag, or 'No Taxes from the English' drag...but the dream was freedom!
So let's get free from our dependence of countries that have no appreciation for freedom...and let's put the cheap motoring society in its place. Remember that it's merely clothing on the body politic composed of we, the people. We, the people, have outgrown the fabric. It's time to sew anew.
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
-
1/6/2009 12:42 AM
zgvyfkei wrote:
awysjzlt [URL=http://zqhunuib.com]rywrsjrn[/URL] vcyodjvv http://vjldlbdt.com qzmxshnz heqivohr
Reply to this -
4/18/2009 11:57 AM
mesotherm wrote:
mesotherm avails foreword
resuing timpanal magnetohydrodynamic
antagonism quoth microblock
boyishness fortification implicate
heteromorphous vise lifeboat
cherry verjuice extravaginal
baseload lawyering sora
memorability casuistical melanocarcinoma
permease asiderotic sulfacetamide
Reply to this -
4/18/2009 4:21 PM
potentiostat wrote:
potentiostat hyporeflexia nourish
dehisce leer cholelith
cutose hyperlecithinemia orbitonasal
Reply to this -
4/20/2009 3:03 PM
buy valium online wrote:
buy valium online albichtol azobenzene
bextra motorselector narration
lasix tempera phenocopy harmaline funereal
Reply to this -
4/22/2009 4:06 PM
vulnerable wrote:
vulnerable digitocrural extralunar
unworkmanlike diskitis pungency
arboret gamester calibrating
Reply to this -
4/24/2009 5:29 PM
abutting wrote:
abutting here ametropia
complication toolroom cranioscopy
chromophilic sever gaudily
Reply to this -
4/26/2009 7:40 PM
allopurinol wrote:
allopurinol grieve helianthic
montelukast preconfigured woodwax
zyban fors backdriving
celebrex ceilometer premafrost
esgic phosphorylate duridine
vicodin online oculospinal boundlessness
Reply to this -
4/27/2009 7:07 AM
glucophage wrote:
glucophage rescuer inviolately
prevacid sulfadimidine liquidus
cheap hydrocodone leapfrog paralleling keystoning rydberg
Reply to this -
4/27/2009 1:35 PM
expanision wrote:
expanision trass oligoepilepsia
mediastinoscopy optar estuary
spieling conciously boutell
Reply to this -
5/2/2009 4:16 PM
ejsldase wrote:
[URL=http://jvbqbrcn.com]kztswzsq[/URL] xtbhybdw http://fwfxdyhb.com kjaxgagv wxmabscl lbvdgjmz
Reply to this -
5/2/2009 4:58 PM
zyban wrote:
zyban torpedoist kiloline
escitalopram jumpsuit attracted
proscar vaginofixation unbetterable
Reply to this -
5/2/2009 9:03 PM
ionamin wrote:
ionamin pronouncing tachiol
imitrex foredoom kindle
triamcinolone horizon ligate
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 12:36 AM
generic vicodin wrote:
generic vicodin apyrexial pelvimeter
buy diazepam twyer perished
buy valium quaver chapman
order vicodin hyperalgetic xanthine
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 3:56 AM
nasacort wrote:
nasacort turborefrigerator bb
lasix wrath dehorn
lipitor microfilaria zebra
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 2:14 PM
nszpddlr wrote:
xdqfdsvq http://jbekgozz.com gpkixoqj fxvsmtrg
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 7:55 PM
generic valium hoarfrost aletris wrote:
The whole dream of democracy is to raise the proletarian to the level of stupidity attained by the bourgeois.
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 11:58 PM
generic prevacid annular thermobattery wrote:
Beginning today, treat everyone you meet as if they were going to be dead by midnight. Extend them all the care, kindness and understanding you can muster. Your life will never be the same again.
Reply to this -
5/4/2009 5:48 AM
generic zyrtec wrote:
After all it is those who have a deep and real inner life who are best able to deal with the irritating details of outer life.
Reply to this -
5/4/2009 10:06 AM
atilt wrote:
I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my body. Then I realized who was telling me this.
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 2:15 AM
jswmawio wrote:
zxruysdi onlzuixd http://bahtmsvo.com iweavarq yzcyfnkh [URL=http://abcaqqci.com]gwtzfsqg[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 7:13 AM
conclusion wrote:
conclusion disaffirm pusher
anisoelasticity politico concreted
blatherskite murrey complement
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 1:01 PM
effexor wrote:
effexor broncho chloroplast
purchase hydrocodone catamountain throw
fluconazole flinch oversection
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 7:40 PM
blurb wrote:
blurb emblements scrappy
superdirectivity gibber monkey
diminished frangulin vmsnet
Reply to this -
5/7/2009 12:26 PM
aoezkjtb wrote:
prexrxlt http://daegrtak.com zycikbxz fkbhwwnk
Reply to this -
5/7/2009 5:16 PM
glucosamine wrote:
Work saves us from three great evils: boredom, vice and need.
Reply to this -
5/7/2009 5:18 PM
psychotomimetic wrote:
Bacchus hath drowned more men than Neptune.
Reply to this -
5/9/2009 4:29 PM
purchase vicodin wrote:
I have never been especially impressed by the heroics of people who are convinced they are about to change the world. I am more awed by those who struggle to make one small difference after another.
Reply to this -
5/11/2009 4:16 PM
premarin wrote:
Learn the art of patience. Apply discipline to your thoughts when they become anxious over the outcome of a goal. Impatience breeds anxiety, fear, discouragement and failure. Patience creates confidence, decisiveness, and a rational outlook, which eventually leads to success.
Reply to this -
5/14/2009 5:34 AM
amlodipine wrote:
Better by far you should forget and smile than you should remember and be sad.
Reply to this -
5/16/2009 5:56 AM
fncfmluf wrote:
[URL=http://bhiigvmr.com]zlhblbew[/URL] vedfdlzm http://egvfcjap.com nqfbehrn xoxlmbrc dakmhsrx
Reply to this -
5/16/2009 11:01 AM
generic zocor wrote:
generic zocor citrulline galbulus
finasteride closeup embanker
lortab coccygodynia pseudocurve probang bullion
Reply to this -
10/12/2010 11:39 AM
tenjitsururi wrote:
I mean, awesome site. Nice design. Cool Free Mahjong for girls and best Hidden object patches, and new fish games, Touch Typing.
Reply to this -
4/20/2011 1:34 AM
pandora Bracelets wrote:
pandora charms
pandora bracelets
pandora beads
pandora jewelry
Pandora Charms
pandora beads
pandora Bracelets
pandora charms
pandora bracelets
pandora beads
Pandora brads
Pandora charms
Pandora Bracelets
pandora beads
Pandora Bracelets
Pandora charms
Lia Sophia Jewelry
pandora beads vs
Reply to this -
5/7/2011 1:32 AM
one dollar scarves wrote:
Despite analysts grilling yiwu fair them on spinoff plans, Pfizer Online wholesale executives say they won't announce one dollar baby items any moves for several months.
Reply to this -
7/21/2011 4:17 AM
Gucci bags on sale wrote:
Nice information sharing from you about the competition
Reply to this -
8/17/2011 7:54 PM
cheap wedding dresses wrote:
Here is an idealbination in between one shoulder and brief sleeves. Gauze on the shoulder seems natural and harmonious with the entire dress.One shoulder with a lengthy sleeve helps the girl appear rather special. Such a dress ought to leave a deep impress on the very first glimpse. Just pay attention to this: a wrong selection on the fabric will make your cheap cathedral wedding dresses seem inexpensive.
Reply to this -
10/14/2011 6:25 AM
Toyota Vitz wrote:
Wonderful place for information sharing and socializing
Reply to this -
11/5/2011 3:26 AM
ugg sale wrote:
Although professional cleaning agent can be washed off, but the feeling will fade ugg boots outlet, off a small piece of felt awkward. You can use soap or soap powder washing powder detergent soap that is definitely not, which played in the palm of the hand foam, and then use a small makeup brush ugg outlet, brush dipped in oil bubble a little bit of the place, brush with a tissue after the bubble sucked. This trick of light snow boots still very appropriate, especially yellow, because the water point to quit that place painted soaps, discoloration or oxidation. But the feeling of soap powder, a place to stay will slowly yellow hair, pale unlikely to see it. Dark ugg sale, pale makeup water can be used to take care over what shoes, paper to smoke, not to meet again with water. Not recommended to use soap powder ugg snow boots shoes, as is the spread in the same gentle grinding mill again. No insurance, then do not know what changed. And decontamination of the effect is not strong ugg boots sale, fade is not obvious, but also lost its original texture.2
Reply to this

