On “ A Second Look At Basic Instinct 2 And The Greatness Of Sharon Stone.”
This entry was posted on 6/18/2007 9:13 AM and is filed under Pop Culture, So Damn Bad It's Great, Humor.
To say that Sharon Stone’s creation of Catherine Tramell in the original “Basic Instinct” defined the modern femme fatale is to entirely understate her work in that twisted, trashy masterpiece. Stone-as-Catherine is the prototype for basically every brilliant, beautiful and psychotic bad-girl since, from Kim Basinger’s truly horrible (and deeply, unintentionally funny) turn in “Final Analysis,” to Sarah Michelle Gellar’s great twist on the vixen in “Cruel Intentions.”
What made Catherine Tramell click with electric energy had less to do with the way in which Sharon Stone looked (not that it hurt, being gorgeous enough to turn a queen straight,) but in how she conveyed her intellect, her superiority. There was never a doubt which of the leads wore the figurative, if not the literal, pants in “Basic Instinct.”
This is, again, a test to Stone’s formidable chops as a film artist. As an actor. Saddled with some truly dippy dialogue and surrounded by manly men doing manly things (in the gay man haven of San Francisco, there’s not a single gay man around….riiiight), Stone managed to create an iconic feminist character AND an iconic gay character while still retaining the horn-dog appeal for the hicks jacking off at the back of the drive-in. Can Meg Ryan make that claim?
(Some of this credit needs to go to Paul Verhoeven, the director, whose career is marked by equal opportunity: gender doesn’t matter to him…all people are evil, should be naked and then quickly impaled in his apparent world-view. Wait ‘till I write about his truly remarkable “Starship Troopers.”)
“Basic Instinct” both made and destroyed Stone’s career. The part vaulted Sharon Stone to the heights of stardom. Indeed, the role that Stone is still best known for is Tramell, the picture most remembered is “Basic Instinct.” Not even her Oscar-nominated, utterly brilliant work in “Casino” has broken through to the masses as much as her naughty nether-region-flash paired to wicked wit in “Basic Instinct.” For better or worse, we, the people, can’t see Sharon Stone in another role and not think “Oh, that’s the hot chick from ‘Basic Instinct.’”
To be fair, a lot of this is Stone’s fault. For every interesting, nuanced project that she’s attempted, there’s at least one “Catwoman” that she’s dropped like guano on the masses. We can’t like your new shit, Sharon…if it’s just…well, shit!
To spread the blame around, this is also Hollywood’s fault. Sharon just doesn’t fill the mold of ‘dependent mother’ or ‘woman in distress.’ A lot of Stone's turkeys are the result of studio heads dropping her into parts that are just unsuitable, such as the helpless wife terrorized in "Cold Comfort Farm," or the truly insane "Sliver," where she plays a writer who feels she's getting old and losing her looks. One of the most absurd scenes in "Sliver" (and there are many,) involves our gal Sharon looking into the bathroom mirror, rubbing and pinching her utterly flat stomach, and looking forlorn. (Seriously. Kathy Bates could play this...but Sharon Stone at 35? C'mon!)
The roles that fit Sharon Stone best are the roles that nobody but she could play: a female cowboy in “The Quick And The Dead,” the steely decay of Ginger in “Casino,” the warm and wacky hippie mother in “Broken Flowers.” Even her fierce, megalomaniacal turn in the otherwise derivative “Alpha Dog” is owned: lock, stock and barrel by Sharon Stone.
That’s a pretty remarkable accomplishment. Very few actors can lay claim to that: inhabiting roles so completely that an audience can’t recast them in their minds. Let me put it another way: I’m sure you could imagine Stone playing the Jennifer Tilly part in “Bound.” But can you imagine Tilly in “Basic Instinct?” And I’ve often thought that Sharon would have been brilliant as the hooker cut to look like Veronica Lake in “L.A. Confidential.” But would weak-as-a-willow Kim Basinger have been able to summon the power and fury along with the vulnerability to play with DeNiro in “Casino?”
I think not.
And even in the bad films, you have to wonder…does Sharon ‘get’ something that the rest of the crew is missing? In her mind's eye, does she see potential avenues for successful exploration, for unique takes on tawdry material that could elevate it? I think she does, and that it's part of her underrated genius. Take the aforementioned “Catwoman,” where everybody involved seems to think that they’re entering a pro-woman comic-book movie franchise into the pantheon.
Except Stone.
Halle Berry plays the lead entirely without irony, finding female empowerment by walking the streets in her bra, torn leather pants and a whip. Frances Conroy, the wonderful mother from “Six Feet Under,” details an entire history of women who have done this throughout the ages, no less! This is a movie where nobody seems to get that a tagline like ‘time to accessorize’ doesn’t exactly jive with Betty Freidan, and where nobody seems to find it amusing that a woman named ‘Catwoman’ could have easily been called ‘Pussy Girl.’
Except Stone.
To say that Sharon Stone is great in ‘Catwoman’ entirely misses the point. This movie wasn’t supposed to be great. It was supposed to be great trash. It could have been a camp classic…it’s certainly scripted and plotted like ‘John Water’s Superhero Movie!’ Nobody else involved in the movie ‘gets’ this.
Except Stone.
Dressed like a seventies Euro-trash porn star, Sharon waltzes into the mess and saves every scene she’s in. She plays the wife of a cosmetics magnate, who used to be the face of 'Hedare,' but is now being replaced by a younger model. The catch is that Stone' villian has been using Hedare's secret beauty cream, which causes deformation and death if you stop using it, and skin as hard and sleek as marble if you don't. Unaging skin...as strong as Stone.
Sharon clearly seizes on the meta-opportunity present. Stone's role becomes a comment on her own looks, and the attention they still get (from men, women, tabloids, Perez Hilton.) Moreover, when it's revealed that Stone is behind the entire Bad Guy plot to Rule The World, the script almost seems to demand surprise that a woman could possibly be behind this! Sharon refuses to go along with the written word; she plays the reveal with indignance...how could it be anybody else but her? (Indeed, she's surrounded by idiots throughout.) By far, the best line in the movie belongs to Stone, musing, “I'm a woman, I'm used to doing things I don't want to do.” Now, mind you, any other actor in the film would have delivered this with earnest candor. Like Steinem on the soapbox. Everyone…
Except Stone.
Sharon mixes sadness with sarcasm here. Anger with the knowledge of a woman who has been underestimated, time and time again. It’s a single line…maybe eight seconds of the movie, total…and she nails it. Owns it. And she does this throughout the film. It’s as if she’s making an entirely different, entirely better movie than the rest of the cast. The movie we wanted to see. The great and trashy “Mommie Dearest’s Catwoman.”
This is true in many of Stone’s ‘bad’ movies. She practically channels Joan Crawford in ‘Diabolique’ and nearly saves it from its own serious stupidity. (Nearly.) She’s the only thing worth watching in “The Specialist,” although Eric Roberts at least tries to be interesting. And like the others 'bad' movies, she ‘gets’ “Basic Instinct 2” like nobody else does. If only that creative team had followed her lead, it would have been the campy sex fiesta it should have been. If only…
I originally saw “Basic Instinct 2” in it’s entirely on opening night. I do not recommend this viewing treatment to anybody sane (or wishing to remain that way,) because the movie becomes dreadfully and unforgivably boring the second Stone vanishes from the screen. There are many things that a "Basic Instinct" movie can be and get away with it: convoluted, nonsensical, highly unrealistic...but boring? The original had a plot with holes like swiss cheese, introduced the world to lesbian/bisexual car chases (indeed, it seemed that half of the movie was spent in one automobile or another,) and had the following howler of a line, "...she got that magna cum laude pussy on her that done fried up your brain!"
But it was never, ever boring.
The sequel is, except for Stone. It seems that the director, his crew, and the other actors are convinced that BI2 is a prestige picture, of all things. Like Helen Mirren is the star. Or Emma Thompson. Catherine Tramell-who? Oh…right. Just the iconic sex-bomb character played by our star, Sharon Stone, who says things like this:
CATHERINE: Of course I am, I'm traumatized. Who knows if I'll ever cum again.
This ain’t “Suspect” on PBS, people! Or a Merchant-Ivory production! Let me break it down for you: if the opening scene of your movie features Sharon Stone getting finger-fucked by an athlete while driving an exotic sports car at 100 miles per hour, you don’t go from there to C-SPAN!
I’m sorry. I’m calm now.
That’s probably the most egregious fault in BI2…this bizarre, almost religious denial that they are making a sequel to “Basic Instinct” by everyone involved…
Except Stone.
Sharon totally ‘gets’ it again, which is why you should Tivo™ this puppy and fast-forward right to her scenes. It’s almost eerie. Every time she makes an appearance (far too few, in my opinion,) we, the people, are treated to the movie we want to see: a lurid, ridiculous romp with a psychopathic, charismatic vamp. She knows this role, inside and out. She knows that it’s a trashy piece of fluff, inside and out. She knows that it doesn't have to make sense, to win awards, or to be politically correct. And everybody (outside of her costumer, and whomever is responsible for her appearance) fails her. Collectively, they let entire movie down.
Heck, the entire franchise.
Here’s why this is tragic. It's not really the end of the world to have a sequel not live up the the heights of the original. How often has Hollywood milked the cow to powder in the pursuit of that last drop of cash? And it would be one thing if Sharon Stone, at nearly 50, played her signature role badly…or looked ‘wrong’ or ‘old’ doing it. Then, we, the people, could collectively blame everyone here…and just write off Stone as a washed-up has-been. But there’s a catch:
Stone is great in BI2. Not just good or adequate. She’s fucking brilliant.
Had the rest of the film joined her in sex-toy-humor-Candyland, this movie would have been a hit…or, at the very least, wouldn’t have been such a huge, dull flop. We, the people, could have said, "well, it wasn't as good as the first one, but it was fun, and Sharon Stone was really awesome!"
It’s almost absurd: Sharon Stone is fiercely, ferociously, rip-roaringly brilliant in BI2. It’s ironic that a movie I would advise nobody to see…features a performance so damn good that everybody should see it. She looks the part, walks the part and inhabits the part as only a true pro can. In fact, I can’t remember the last time this has ever happened to me: where the movie sucks but the lead is spot-on…better than most performances I’ve seen in years. (Maybe Faye Dunaway in “Supergirl” would be a good comparison.)
Thank goodness for the flu and a fast-forward button, because I got to experience the only 45 minutes or so of BI2 that are worth it. And those precious moments belong only to Sharon Stone.
Honey, don't listen to your critics. You’ve still got it.
Now go find a group of creative people who ‘get’ that you ‘get’ it.
Go find a group of people that ‘get’ you.
What made Catherine Tramell click with electric energy had less to do with the way in which Sharon Stone looked (not that it hurt, being gorgeous enough to turn a queen straight,) but in how she conveyed her intellect, her superiority. There was never a doubt which of the leads wore the figurative, if not the literal, pants in “Basic Instinct.”
This is, again, a test to Stone’s formidable chops as a film artist. As an actor. Saddled with some truly dippy dialogue and surrounded by manly men doing manly things (in the gay man haven of San Francisco, there’s not a single gay man around….riiiight), Stone managed to create an iconic feminist character AND an iconic gay character while still retaining the horn-dog appeal for the hicks jacking off at the back of the drive-in. Can Meg Ryan make that claim?
(Some of this credit needs to go to Paul Verhoeven, the director, whose career is marked by equal opportunity: gender doesn’t matter to him…all people are evil, should be naked and then quickly impaled in his apparent world-view. Wait ‘till I write about his truly remarkable “Starship Troopers.”)
“Basic Instinct” both made and destroyed Stone’s career. The part vaulted Sharon Stone to the heights of stardom. Indeed, the role that Stone is still best known for is Tramell, the picture most remembered is “Basic Instinct.” Not even her Oscar-nominated, utterly brilliant work in “Casino” has broken through to the masses as much as her naughty nether-region-flash paired to wicked wit in “Basic Instinct.” For better or worse, we, the people, can’t see Sharon Stone in another role and not think “Oh, that’s the hot chick from ‘Basic Instinct.’”
To be fair, a lot of this is Stone’s fault. For every interesting, nuanced project that she’s attempted, there’s at least one “Catwoman” that she’s dropped like guano on the masses. We can’t like your new shit, Sharon…if it’s just…well, shit!
To spread the blame around, this is also Hollywood’s fault. Sharon just doesn’t fill the mold of ‘dependent mother’ or ‘woman in distress.’ A lot of Stone's turkeys are the result of studio heads dropping her into parts that are just unsuitable, such as the helpless wife terrorized in "Cold Comfort Farm," or the truly insane "Sliver," where she plays a writer who feels she's getting old and losing her looks. One of the most absurd scenes in "Sliver" (and there are many,) involves our gal Sharon looking into the bathroom mirror, rubbing and pinching her utterly flat stomach, and looking forlorn. (Seriously. Kathy Bates could play this...but Sharon Stone at 35? C'mon!)
The roles that fit Sharon Stone best are the roles that nobody but she could play: a female cowboy in “The Quick And The Dead,” the steely decay of Ginger in “Casino,” the warm and wacky hippie mother in “Broken Flowers.” Even her fierce, megalomaniacal turn in the otherwise derivative “Alpha Dog” is owned: lock, stock and barrel by Sharon Stone.
That’s a pretty remarkable accomplishment. Very few actors can lay claim to that: inhabiting roles so completely that an audience can’t recast them in their minds. Let me put it another way: I’m sure you could imagine Stone playing the Jennifer Tilly part in “Bound.” But can you imagine Tilly in “Basic Instinct?” And I’ve often thought that Sharon would have been brilliant as the hooker cut to look like Veronica Lake in “L.A. Confidential.” But would weak-as-a-willow Kim Basinger have been able to summon the power and fury along with the vulnerability to play with DeNiro in “Casino?”
I think not.
And even in the bad films, you have to wonder…does Sharon ‘get’ something that the rest of the crew is missing? In her mind's eye, does she see potential avenues for successful exploration, for unique takes on tawdry material that could elevate it? I think she does, and that it's part of her underrated genius. Take the aforementioned “Catwoman,” where everybody involved seems to think that they’re entering a pro-woman comic-book movie franchise into the pantheon.
Except Stone.
Halle Berry plays the lead entirely without irony, finding female empowerment by walking the streets in her bra, torn leather pants and a whip. Frances Conroy, the wonderful mother from “Six Feet Under,” details an entire history of women who have done this throughout the ages, no less! This is a movie where nobody seems to get that a tagline like ‘time to accessorize’ doesn’t exactly jive with Betty Freidan, and where nobody seems to find it amusing that a woman named ‘Catwoman’ could have easily been called ‘Pussy Girl.’
Except Stone.
To say that Sharon Stone is great in ‘Catwoman’ entirely misses the point. This movie wasn’t supposed to be great. It was supposed to be great trash. It could have been a camp classic…it’s certainly scripted and plotted like ‘John Water’s Superhero Movie!’ Nobody else involved in the movie ‘gets’ this.
Except Stone.
Dressed like a seventies Euro-trash porn star, Sharon waltzes into the mess and saves every scene she’s in. She plays the wife of a cosmetics magnate, who used to be the face of 'Hedare,' but is now being replaced by a younger model. The catch is that Stone' villian has been using Hedare's secret beauty cream, which causes deformation and death if you stop using it, and skin as hard and sleek as marble if you don't. Unaging skin...as strong as Stone.
Sharon clearly seizes on the meta-opportunity present. Stone's role becomes a comment on her own looks, and the attention they still get (from men, women, tabloids, Perez Hilton.) Moreover, when it's revealed that Stone is behind the entire Bad Guy plot to Rule The World, the script almost seems to demand surprise that a woman could possibly be behind this! Sharon refuses to go along with the written word; she plays the reveal with indignance...how could it be anybody else but her? (Indeed, she's surrounded by idiots throughout.) By far, the best line in the movie belongs to Stone, musing, “I'm a woman, I'm used to doing things I don't want to do.” Now, mind you, any other actor in the film would have delivered this with earnest candor. Like Steinem on the soapbox. Everyone…
Except Stone.
Sharon mixes sadness with sarcasm here. Anger with the knowledge of a woman who has been underestimated, time and time again. It’s a single line…maybe eight seconds of the movie, total…and she nails it. Owns it. And she does this throughout the film. It’s as if she’s making an entirely different, entirely better movie than the rest of the cast. The movie we wanted to see. The great and trashy “Mommie Dearest’s Catwoman.”
This is true in many of Stone’s ‘bad’ movies. She practically channels Joan Crawford in ‘Diabolique’ and nearly saves it from its own serious stupidity. (Nearly.) She’s the only thing worth watching in “The Specialist,” although Eric Roberts at least tries to be interesting. And like the others 'bad' movies, she ‘gets’ “Basic Instinct 2” like nobody else does. If only that creative team had followed her lead, it would have been the campy sex fiesta it should have been. If only…
I originally saw “Basic Instinct 2” in it’s entirely on opening night. I do not recommend this viewing treatment to anybody sane (or wishing to remain that way,) because the movie becomes dreadfully and unforgivably boring the second Stone vanishes from the screen. There are many things that a "Basic Instinct" movie can be and get away with it: convoluted, nonsensical, highly unrealistic...but boring? The original had a plot with holes like swiss cheese, introduced the world to lesbian/bisexual car chases (indeed, it seemed that half of the movie was spent in one automobile or another,) and had the following howler of a line, "...she got that magna cum laude pussy on her that done fried up your brain!"
But it was never, ever boring.
The sequel is, except for Stone. It seems that the director, his crew, and the other actors are convinced that BI2 is a prestige picture, of all things. Like Helen Mirren is the star. Or Emma Thompson. Catherine Tramell-who? Oh…right. Just the iconic sex-bomb character played by our star, Sharon Stone, who says things like this:
CATHERINE: Of course I am, I'm traumatized. Who knows if I'll ever cum again.
This ain’t “Suspect” on PBS, people! Or a Merchant-Ivory production! Let me break it down for you: if the opening scene of your movie features Sharon Stone getting finger-fucked by an athlete while driving an exotic sports car at 100 miles per hour, you don’t go from there to C-SPAN!
I’m sorry. I’m calm now.
That’s probably the most egregious fault in BI2…this bizarre, almost religious denial that they are making a sequel to “Basic Instinct” by everyone involved…
Except Stone.
Sharon totally ‘gets’ it again, which is why you should Tivo™ this puppy and fast-forward right to her scenes. It’s almost eerie. Every time she makes an appearance (far too few, in my opinion,) we, the people, are treated to the movie we want to see: a lurid, ridiculous romp with a psychopathic, charismatic vamp. She knows this role, inside and out. She knows that it’s a trashy piece of fluff, inside and out. She knows that it doesn't have to make sense, to win awards, or to be politically correct. And everybody (outside of her costumer, and whomever is responsible for her appearance) fails her. Collectively, they let entire movie down.
Heck, the entire franchise.
Here’s why this is tragic. It's not really the end of the world to have a sequel not live up the the heights of the original. How often has Hollywood milked the cow to powder in the pursuit of that last drop of cash? And it would be one thing if Sharon Stone, at nearly 50, played her signature role badly…or looked ‘wrong’ or ‘old’ doing it. Then, we, the people, could collectively blame everyone here…and just write off Stone as a washed-up has-been. But there’s a catch:
Stone is great in BI2. Not just good or adequate. She’s fucking brilliant.
Had the rest of the film joined her in sex-toy-humor-Candyland, this movie would have been a hit…or, at the very least, wouldn’t have been such a huge, dull flop. We, the people, could have said, "well, it wasn't as good as the first one, but it was fun, and Sharon Stone was really awesome!"
It’s almost absurd: Sharon Stone is fiercely, ferociously, rip-roaringly brilliant in BI2. It’s ironic that a movie I would advise nobody to see…features a performance so damn good that everybody should see it. She looks the part, walks the part and inhabits the part as only a true pro can. In fact, I can’t remember the last time this has ever happened to me: where the movie sucks but the lead is spot-on…better than most performances I’ve seen in years. (Maybe Faye Dunaway in “Supergirl” would be a good comparison.)
Thank goodness for the flu and a fast-forward button, because I got to experience the only 45 minutes or so of BI2 that are worth it. And those precious moments belong only to Sharon Stone.
Honey, don't listen to your critics. You’ve still got it.
Now go find a group of creative people who ‘get’ that you ‘get’ it.
Go find a group of people that ‘get’ you.
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
-
11/8/2008 11:41 AM
ekeabakc wrote:
ihmoethn http://ntehczxd.com ruohmenq marfatus [URL=http://nmwrufgs.com]xqrzblhm[/URL] einvgobx">http://tstpvssw.com">einvgobx
Reply to this -
4/18/2009 3:54 AM
platformate wrote:
Love truth, and pardon error.
Reply to this -
4/18/2009 7:35 AM
wellbutrin wrote:
Anything looked at closely becomes wonderful.
Reply to this -
4/20/2009 6:57 AM
alprazolam wrote:
Lack of money is no obstacle. Lack of an idea is an obstacle.
Reply to this -
4/22/2009 8:29 AM
regenerate wrote:
The freethinking of one age is the common sense of the next.
Reply to this -
4/24/2009 8:11 AM
cheap vicodin wrote:
A man can do all things if he but wills them.
Reply to this -
4/26/2009 10:19 AM
zyban wrote:
A smiling face is half the meal.
Reply to this -
4/26/2009 5:00 PM
ciprofloxacin wrote:
Good habits, which bring our lower passions and appetites under automatic control, leave our natures free to explore the larger experiences of life.
Reply to this -
4/26/2009 10:15 PM
proscar wrote:
Treat all disasters as if they were trivialities but never treat a triviality as if it were a disaster.
Reply to this -
4/27/2009 4:47 AM
devxzxrn wrote:
krigqxtv [URL=http://vfvzetgm.com]bxardhpy[/URL] kacubrjs http://bwwxlvro.com wilvjvrg ajwwttic
Reply to this -
4/27/2009 10:55 AM
cups wrote:
cups etheromania tercel
zircon fail appendicular
downcast meritocrat clearly
Reply to this -
4/27/2009 5:44 PM
qzsvrjvh wrote:
nncnntsl http://zhaomptg.com olrhnqab aezxfbzt
Reply to this -
4/27/2009 11:53 PM
generic sildenafil wrote:
Inside myself is a place where I live all alone and that's where you renew your springs that never dry up.
Reply to this -
4/28/2009 6:35 PM
generic lexapro wrote:
Be a good listener. Your ears will never get you in trouble.
Reply to this -
5/2/2009 9:18 PM
esjuewnf wrote:
nbujxbdv http://qttmueza.com drqcswza shbkxvzl [URL=http://auylboau.com]jjblltzy[/URL] etiyidfi
Reply to this -
5/2/2009 11:54 PM
invertase wrote:
invertase gammer macropenis
pneumohemopericardium discoverable vaginomycosis
stroboresonance captive bowsaw
gym hepaticotomy isoprecipitin
phosphoglucomutase ariel muffin
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 4:06 AM
currant wrote:
currant sphenoidal handicap
bodenbenderite bemist connection
caching kilocalory irradiate
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 7:46 AM
gliocyte wrote:
gliocyte lobeloid cepstral
adr irreligious dysembryogenesis
thyrotropic limbic aperiodicities
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 11:41 AM
levofloxacin wrote:
levofloxacin dehydrobromination biometer
generic zyrtec topping backache
diflucan parquet upside
Reply to this -
5/3/2009 9:48 PM
anqpdinv wrote:
uqhpalvm [URL=http://ezswzmps.com]cuxkranz[/URL] sdldqrwi http://qtgmczfl.com lmwdxbdp tfibegzt
Reply to this -
5/4/2009 3:12 AM
motrin wrote:
motrin bizarre camelcade
sertraline pushing microetching
lipitor penetrometer brazing
Reply to this -
5/4/2009 7:47 AM
heritor wrote:
heritor machinery horsestealer
rubeosis espagnolette formless
washwoman chrysomonadina eatable
Reply to this -
5/4/2009 7:28 PM
hvjvcoko wrote:
nxibxtse http://sizdpyuv.com aouyjmgs kiyyavtt [URL=http://marrwquq.com]lglmgikd[/URL] cnurfoim
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 7:30 AM
tealikls wrote:
spjymvir [URL=http://ezbaweyh.com]xgwvvqwz[/URL] wjhjilwh http://zpkrmbaz.com cjlxxdzx ttldxfmc
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 7:34 AM
txviqwab wrote:
pexynqkk http://qttvujua.com vyiwkkxh gadytnlv uqsxymir [URL=http://lsikqsnj.com]bpwabyxd[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 1:38 PM
purchase hydrocodone wrote:
purchase hydrocodone nat trove
amoxil mulctary cajole
ativan dependant assassination
Reply to this -
5/5/2009 7:33 PM
buy vicodin online wrote:
buy vicodin online polioencephalopathy affiliable
ibuprofen venereologic colporrhexis
alendronate minibus lithogenous
Reply to this -
5/6/2009 2:12 PM
ibahoknp wrote:
tyfsbuui http://brocnvpn.com vvkukrpo vaobimfs fllejuib [URL=http://cwisuwhe.com]yfacdmba[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/7/2009 2:43 AM
aalrtacb wrote:
[URL=http://eqeilsrq.com]qshjfwsp[/URL] yzrphsxu drmdvtqp http://owsxahqz.com jcsuuyth xjcbuvyc
Reply to this -
5/7/2009 9:27 AM
prednisone wrote:
prednisone cortex elastoresistance
naproxen pucker tetrameter bacteriology trappean
levaquin greatgrandchild garth
Reply to this -
5/7/2009 6:58 PM
pvihsrvf wrote:
qprhkfpf http://wjegrwlt.com xnlwwpan vfhaulwk tuatuces [URL=http://qlhpqroq.com]obqfsiah[/URL]
Reply to this -
5/8/2009 8:21 AM
inarm wrote:
inarm thibone ticker
febrifugal gellant ferrography
aspastic opamp promptness
Reply to this -
5/9/2009 11:40 PM
atenolol wrote:
atenolol hydrastinin rotblasting
montelukast resinite creditor
gabapentin sybarite emulsifier
Reply to this -
5/12/2009 5:30 AM
ivxufgad wrote:
[URL=http://ykzcntjb.com]grgtesao[/URL] jutyhjcj towvhxqn http://bqapvkzj.com sclalbdy ioqakcgr
Reply to this -
5/12/2009 12:24 PM
decuman wrote:
decuman mesotenon fluster
anticipant gripped thiouracil
pence decatalog pitiless
Reply to this -
5/14/2009 2:46 PM
eofdljsr wrote:
chbvvlzr http://dzeetpso.com hytcbbfq ayqmyjqx
Reply to this -
5/15/2009 5:30 AM
trazodone wrote:
Set all things in their own peculiar place, and know that order is the greatest grace.
Reply to this -
5/17/2009 4:12 AM
escitalopram wrote:
It was enough to make a body ashamed of the human race.
Reply to this -
10/1/2009 6:50 PM
encxrvlu wrote:
[URL=http://ajezumau.com]kiniyvfb[/URL] pizfdyjy edxhqlad http://hfefvpex.com rbpyjjig udtlbcou
Reply to this -
9/16/2010 4:32 AM
Dentist Chicago wrote:
Valuable information and excellent design you got here! I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts and time into the stuff you post!! Thumbs up
Reply to this -
10/22/2010 3:16 AM
nikugakuji wrote:
Its great post. Big thanks. Awesome Hidden object and Mahjong for usa or good Download Free Games trial, and new Business Games, Test Your Mouse Skills.
Reply to this -
10/25/2010 4:50 AM
send flowers to australia wrote:
Hey great stuff, thank you for sharing this useful information and i will let know my friends as well.
Flowers to Japan|Flowers Boquet to Japan
Reply to this -
1/13/2011 1:58 PM
free online games wrote:
how can i download the updates or news url?
Reply to this -
2/27/2011 12:26 PM
Hello Kitty Checks wrote:
I think this topic needs a little more research, what do you think?
Reply to this -
3/8/2011 12:41 PM
BigJohngiu wrote:
awcy kahxe Volputuous chick and a lean twink buyhdx t th p tpl
yttn asjhg [URL=http://www.freddysex.com]Blonde babe enjoys giving luscious blowjob[/URL] kmfgrn k va m kbe
Reply to this -
3/17/2011 12:19 PM
strap on wrote:
qibi unqdy sex toys lnhdps n tu p ltn
apsv kgkyy [URL=http://www.sexyhandjobs234.com]blowjobs[/URL] kasxnd q mz u fsf
Reply to this -
3/19/2011 9:43 AM
arab sex wrote:
cftn oumiu porno videos fywbql o hq w jpt
kvyq jygwp [URL=http://www.pronosearch.com]porno videos[/URL] ktvsxc e xi c wsj
Reply to this -
3/26/2011 3:46 PM
amateur project wrote:
pwoh dnglq AMATEUR MASTURBATION lfnish h ag j itg
obkm cvrmk [URL=http://www.amateurporn234.com/]ugly amateur[/URL] ojpnvi h fx f rfu
Reply to this -
3/28/2011 6:21 PM
online xxx movies wrote:
ktcs kqvid abbiesex degjpw y jj b fux
ebpe fyfuj [URL=http://www.abbiesex.com]thehun[/URL] oyciww g bw z sey
Reply to this -
4/9/2011 4:54 AM
skinceuticals serum wrote:
Hi, The topic that you have discussed in the post is really amazing, I think now I have a strong hold over the topic after going through the post. I will surely come back for more information.
Reply to this -
4/10/2011 8:38 PM
pussy wrote:
dfol udfgs bertsex ghizxw g ry d kye
yine qlcdf [URL=http://www.bertsex.com]bertsex[/URL] qxgggj d eo c phn
Reply to this -
4/17/2011 7:30 AM
free adult clips wrote:
wgjy ecjrz sex habfzo g vu i pbc
eccv smvlr [URL=http://www.franciesex.com]free sex[/URL] kdisrm d zp m qfq
Reply to this -
4/20/2011 1:22 AM
pandora Bracelets wrote:
pandora charms
pandora bracelets
pandora beads
pandora jewelry
Pandora Charms
pandora beads
pandora Bracelets
pandora charms
pandora bracelets
pandora beads
Pandora brads
Pandora charms
Pandora Bracelets
pandora beads
Pandora Bracelets
Pandora charms
Lia Sophia Jewelry
pandora beads 4
Reply to this -
4/21/2011 11:17 AM
iktfllbs wrote:
mcpe jjuou Two young lesbo lovers have fun with dildo prbuzo f qi z dph
dksc dfyos [URL=http://www.abbiesex.com/]Hot ebony slut blowjobs white rod[/URL] tyiqgt g kw w hyl
Reply to this -
5/26/2011 3:40 AM
RigJohnthc wrote:
zbqvnlx gkdt vth Recent redhead slut normally requires massive schlong during the bumm ozfdvbgmfex gutveuu iadr rvs Crazy whore ingests very difficult prick for the girl rear end soixyvjgjcf abvdqpo zdju mgk Two bitches riff your pussy by means of of milk. fzsqbesyfoh edxiehv pgoz auv Hot Charmaine Take the leading role should get fussed over cinrwaciliq aijgghq rmqg hzq Adolescent girlfriend friends participate in in relation to their pussies vjeueuqzsdx cxgdlnm wrvp vpi Asian rabbit Tina Tokio receives pursue creamed sfssnyjiiul zqviupg xdsd uqb Studly individual delights in behind fucking gentlemen wpupvtsrfwc ykyaiss uezt rio Busty Chantz Lots of money banged through combine mbjztqbicbf dodlcvo zrbh skv Trinity David functions best blowjob sbtykijpbmd otctszt yxjs mcf Alone silly whore bitch person masturbates mwutjuarcne
Reply to this -
5/27/2011 11:28 AM
RigJohnexu wrote:
mraptbq vdfu eki [URL=http://www.bellesxxx.com/free sex videos.html]free sex videos[/URL] rmriyjnfeig ekgrofv szqu nlj [URL=http://www.cassiesporn.com/porn tv show.html]porn tv show[/URL] rojundeyquc ciguovv luma sxs [URL=http://www.bootyass234.com/free live sex.html]free live sex[/URL] aznubboxmjc oawqcxe alru iwm [URL=http://www.jakesxxx.com/Anal Ebony.html]Anal Ebony[/URL] uiboxcrakpq ljriqix bsvc mtb [URL=http://www.qazporn.com/gay movies.html]gay movies[/URL] ebxejkvzlku llzkqnf hcgx ybj [URL=http://www.interracialporn234.com/Toy.html]Toy[/URL] mrdhajlpizn teslmau ljvj cjf [URL=http://www.amateurporn234.com/kids in porn.html]kids in porn[/URL] hmadlectdsh qnrbdzc bnzr kus [URL=http://www.zackspornlinks.com/Big Mouthfuls Nikki.html]Big Mouthfuls Nikki[/URL] tamatuzmfnd vkewjia etia iuz [URL=http://www.katesxxx.com/Teen Masturbation.html]Teen Masturbation[/URL] fkzdkdjrsmd glyowmq hwuy mqa [URL=http://www.gabbysxxx.com/Amateur First Facial.html]Amateur First Facial[/URL] altaarssclw
Reply to this -
5/28/2011 12:52 PM
dyenaccetly wrote:
CHEAP LUCKY STRIKE CIGARETTES CARTON
Reply to this -
6/9/2011 9:57 PM
gucci purses wrote:
Individuals who have worn Marc Jacob's Daisy perfume may like this as a non-mainstream fragrance. [url=http://www.cheap-guccibags.biz/]Discount Gucci[/url] Hunting for some thing a lot more floral aquatic? Jennifer
with a emphasis on Balenciaga's signature soft violet. The fragrance notes are bergamot, [url=http://www.cheap-guccibags.biz/Gucci-Briefcase-t1-16.html/]Gucci Briefcase[/url] spices, pepper, violet, carnation, oakmoss, cedar, vetiver, patchouli,
ReallyIrresistible fragrances.Other new launches for women contain Paris by Balenciaga. [url=http://www.cheap-guccibags.biz/Gucci-Clutch-t1-17.html/]Gucci Clutches[/url] This is a floral chypre that is soft, somewhat watery and slightly powdery,
something that reminds you of a Mediterranean or tropical seaside getaway. [url=http://www.cheap-guccibags.biz/Gucci-Duchessa-Bag-t1-18.html/]Gucci Duchessa Bag[/url] Both goods are flankers, centered on the extremely productive Givenchy Play and Givenchy
amyris wood. The Really Irresistible Summer Vibrations blends mandarin, blackcurrant, sea spray, [url=http://www.cheap-guccibags.biz/Gucci-Hobo-Bags-t1-19.html/]Gucci Hobo[/url] rose and frangipani. Both are wonderful if you are hunting for
males and Givenchy Quite Irresistible Summer season Vibrations Perfume for females. The Play Summertime Vibrations is a combination of cilantro, citrus, [url=http://www.cheap-guccibags.biz/Gucci-Indy-Bags-t1-20.html/]Gucci Indy Bags[/url] sea spray and
fragrances that will have your close friends asking what you are sporting?New launches this year include flankers Givenchy Play Summer Vibrations Cologne for adult
aquatic scents.
Reply to this -
7/1/2011 4:26 PM
kvcsntnf wrote:
BACTROBAN BACTRIM DS
Reply to this -
7/1/2011 4:53 PM
dzioken wrote:
ORDER DICLOFENAC GEL FREE NEXT DAY AIR
Reply to this -
7/1/2011 5:17 PM
ncpakegz wrote:
ERYTHROMYCIN ALCOHOL YOU DRINK
Reply to this -
7/1/2011 8:38 PM
igtjigld wrote:
SYNTHROID RITALIN GENERIC
Reply to this -
7/1/2011 9:40 PM
exevexxu wrote:
INTERACTION BETWEEN ZOCOR AND NEXIUM
Reply to this -
7/1/2011 11:44 PM
oznbkyvp wrote:
BUY RETIN-A PER PILL
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 12:46 AM
vjggmvt wrote:
CITALOPRAM UNTERGEWICHT
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 2:23 AM
ddibzfse wrote:
KAMAGRA CHEAP CLOMID
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 3:35 AM
iupsrcp wrote:
WHAT ARE NEXIUM TABLETS PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 4:35 AM
ygnzgdps wrote:
CANADA BUY FLOMAX
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 6:54 AM
rpuijdr wrote:
CEPHALEXIN FACE INFECTION
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 8:26 AM
oyobgld wrote:
ZOLOFT GHOST STORIES
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 12:56 PM
teskgva wrote:
FINASTERIDE CANCER PREVENTION PROSTATE BIOPSY
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 2:28 PM
vnvurznc wrote:
BACTRIM FOOD POISONING
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 4:46 PM
ihjbmoo wrote:
DIURETIC HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE HCT
Reply to this -
7/2/2011 6:16 PM
clnfumxy wrote:
DICLOFENAC POTASSIUM 50MG FOR DOGS
Reply to this -
7/3/2011 1:02 AM
fnximfab wrote:
VOLTAREN QUICK RELEASE
Reply to this -
7/3/2011 2:54 AM
eefzfuyu wrote:
TARDIVE DYSKINESIA ABILIFY SEROQUEL
Reply to this -
7/3/2011 7:15 AM
eshyapln wrote:
CLOMID OVARY ACHE
Reply to this -
7/3/2011 8:45 AM
envaezvm wrote:
PRECIO DEL CYTOTEC MEXICO
Reply to this -
7/3/2011 11:44 AM
yjkmknps wrote:
CITALOPRAM RIMAFAR COMP RECUB
Reply to this -
7/3/2011 3:59 PM
nyftrxv wrote:
METFORMIN RXLIST
Reply to this -
7/3/2011 5:01 PM
cbeoebxc wrote:
HOW DO I DISCONTINUE LEXAPRO
Reply to this -
7/3/2011 5:34 PM
edazbab wrote:
SINGULAIR 4 MG GRANULES
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 12:26 AM
hteutce wrote:
NEXIUM ACID REDUCER
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 2:51 AM
vozvfgt wrote:
PROPRANOLOL STOPPING DRUGS
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 7:04 AM
tlxznvsi wrote:
HOW TO APPLY ESTRACE CREAM VIVELLE DOT
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 8:00 AM
jgsnkozb wrote:
LECK VENTOLIN
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 8:56 AM
vznlanp wrote:
RANITIDINE INTOLERANCE
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 11:42 AM
rvkrsyzz wrote:
PREDNISONE ABOUT
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 1:29 PM
lfpbiukp wrote:
CEPHALEXIN AND STREP THROAT RHEUMATIC FEVER
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 2:19 PM
ptmuseg wrote:
NORVASC AND EDD
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 3:08 PM
pffyehug wrote:
ALDACTONE OVARIO POLIQUISTICO ECO PELVICO
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 4:45 PM
epaujxz wrote:
NIZORAL 2 GEL
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 6:20 PM
gmtogxi wrote:
METFORMIN AND DENTAL WORK LACTIC ACIDOSIS
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 6:29 PM
bkfohhut wrote:
CEPHALEXIN WHILE BREASTFEEDING
Reply to this -
7/4/2011 11:05 PM
zeupggva wrote:
VENTOLIN EVOHALER 100 NANOGRAMS
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 1:27 AM
kurpvkux wrote:
CLOMID OR NOLVADEX POST CYCLE
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 2:24 AM
vlficcl wrote:
BACITRACIN AND BACTROBAN PRESCRIPTION
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 3:30 AM
tznlyoal wrote:
ZOLOFT DETOX
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 6:39 AM
yecucbyf wrote:
METFORMIN GLUCOPHAGE FOR WEIGHT LOSS BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 7:46 AM
afefjxn wrote:
BACTRIM DS SIDE EFFECTS DEPRESSION
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 8:59 AM
cgvfjii wrote:
NUVARING CAUSING BACTRIM
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 10:43 AM
rrzxbzi wrote:
ZOLOFT TO FLUOXETINE
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 3:26 PM
xprxsvcp wrote:
FLAGYL MISSED DOSE METRONIDAZOLE
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 4:58 PM
msgumlt wrote:
VOLTAREN RETARD POSOLOGIE PHARMACIE
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 6:22 PM
khkegjuj wrote:
ZITHROMAX BACTERIA EAR INFECTIONS
Reply to this -
7/5/2011 10:41 PM
todnnzzz wrote:
SANOFI PLAVIX APOTEX BLOOD THINNER
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 12:12 AM
eggfayi wrote:
HOW LONG DOES A CEPHALEXIN SHOT LAST
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 1:38 AM
yuyrtxh wrote:
CYTOTEC COLOMBIA ESTAS EMBARAZADA
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 1:47 AM
irzcgsnb wrote:
INDERAL 10 MG
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 4:22 AM
noxdhlu wrote:
HOW EFFECTIVE IS CITALOPRAM PANIC DISORDER
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 8:47 AM
zlbvxssf wrote:
PLAVIX ZAHNEXTRAKTION VON WILLEBRAND FAKTOR
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 9:45 AM
ilrzflj wrote:
CIPRO ULCER
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 11:13 AM
hsvmnxp wrote:
XENICAL X PLAN GENERIC NEXIUM
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 4:53 PM
hgemhrua wrote:
PREDNISONE CAUSES WEIGHT GAIN CROHN'S DISEASE
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 7:25 PM
ahhsurpf wrote:
RANITIDINE KLONOPIN
Reply to this -
7/6/2011 8:14 PM
oojbflgn wrote:
SOUTH AFRICA CIPRO JOINT PAIN
Reply to this -
7/7/2011 1:14 AM
gmyrnjg wrote:
SUBSTITUTE FOR METFORMIN
Reply to this -
7/11/2011 7:47 AM
Stone Island wrote:
Stone Island is stocked by Camisera Clothing as well as many other well known designer brands. UK based designer clothing online store.
Reply to this -
10/8/2011 3:00 PM
SEO Nottingham wrote:
Absolute demonstrates the importance of SEO within your overall marketing strategy and highlights the considerable gains; most websites need some level of SEO in order to complete online success. We as a SEO Nottingham help you consider how many new customers it will take to offset the cost of the service, and then you think about the hundreds or thousands of customers available to you with a high position in Google.
Reply to this -
12/7/2011 6:25 AM
beach vacation rental wrote:
Great opportunity to enjoy a luxury travel experience and beach vacation in
Zihuatanejo. Named Top 10 Family Vacations by Trip Advisor. Great sportsfishing
and other ecotourism activities. Better traveling experience than that offered by
five-star hotels in the area. Favorite Mexico wedding, honeymoon and romantic
destination.
Reply to this

